And now we turn to the “tasty” one, so to speak, to the provocative behavior of Stanislav Vasilyev, when, after viewing the review on himself from Mikhail Karatsüpa, this techno-blogger called his mother the word “slut” and told how he performed a mental act of sex intercourse with her. From the side of this behavior seems to be boorish and unacceptable. However, Stanislav Vasilyev only uses his “weapon”, so to speak, “freedom of speech” against Mikhail Karatsiup, and does this from a position of some kind of formality, when in response to a veiled insult Stanislav Vasilyev uses direct name-calling without any flattering hints.
What can you say about the offensive behavior of Stanislav Vasilyev in relation to Mikhail Karatsyupy? This situation is ambiguous. One category of an audience close to Stanislav considers this to be just a statement of the fact that this techno-blogger is too emotional, and the other half will relate to this fact with a special attitude. A special attitude will be expressed in the fact that Stanislav Vasilyev will try to justify from the position of using his so-called post-irony. This strange word means scoffing at some fact from the point of concealing its sincere attitude towards it. That is, in relation to the situation with Vasilyev and Karatsyupa, this will consist in the deliberate “thick provocative trolling” of the “Pogranichnik” video blogger according to this techno-blogger. So Vasiliev’s loyal subscriber will say something like this: “Stas does not call the Border Guard, it’s just such a post-irony! You are stupid! You could not buy it back! ”
Regarding this conflict situation, it can be said that none of these two video bloggers are either good or bad. There is no need to block out, because from the side of “Pogranichnik”, and from the side of Stanislav Vasilyev an exchange of offensive language was done. vip-popki.net/en
The fact that the Pogranichnik video blogger created discredited content on Stanislav Vasilyev is not necessarily something bad. At least, the TUE community thinks so. The Internet gives people the freedom to express themselves, and YouTube gives people the freedom to express themselves through video content. And even if that “Pogranichnik” has a weighty audience, then even in this case, Stanislav Vasilyev is unlikely to file a statement with the court demanding public apologies from Mikhail Karatsüpa for his attitude to him as the so-called cattle. Why? All because Stanislav Vasilyev, though superior to the “Border Guard” in popularity, will not be able to call this techno-blogger a “bird of high flight”. Yes, Stanislav Vasilyev is popular, but not so much so that the discrediting behavior of other video bloggers regarding him caused in this techno-blogger a desire to restore its trampled dignity.